|
what are you trying to research?
there's a couple HUGE issues with "wine experts"
- everyone has different tastes
- not every wine is available in every store in the state/country/world
so a review of Year X of Vinter Y is Z'ly superb is completely meaningless if you can't get your hands or it
or worse yet, dry whites give you a headache
having spent some effort in what turned out to be a totally futile attempt to penetrate & understand the world of "wine experts" I just quit. it became quite obvious that my tastes don't always agree with the hottest release.
when I go to the store I always buy a bottle of something new. if I can't find a better reason, perhaps it just a pretty label.
I keep my notes in a text file; print it out now and then and leave it in the car so it's handy when I pass by the wine shop.
if you want to research something, list out all the descriptive terms used by the "wine experts" and see if you can define them in words that all/most people can understand and which consuming a glass will prove accurate. just defining the degrees of "dry" and "sweet" will be a challenge. defining a "hint of fruitiness / oak aging / <etc>" is probably not possible. just exactly does "full bodied" mean to a wine novice? buying wine "by the numbers" is not likely to succeed.
I've got a list of "50 Wines You Can Always Trust" - well, I worked my way though about 10 on them - more than thirty five are not available except by full case special order - and of those 10, I like maybe two.
there is no accounting for taste. might be more productive to list types of foods and typical wine descriptions that go well with them.
there's the old standby reds with beef and whites with seafood. lots of objections to that but what happens with pasta dishes? fried chicken? souffle? stuffed pork chop?
__________________
|