Okay, maybe this is just me.
While most of these seem completely justified and common sense, others sound like nitpicky server complaints. The one thing on that list that rubs me the wrong way is the if-you're-finished-with-your-meal-GET-OUT point.
I'm sorry, but I go out to dinner, not only to eat, but also to socialize with friends. It should be relaxing and enjoyable, and I really dislike feeling like I'm being pushed out the door when dinner is done. Now granted, if a place is super busy and I see a sea of people waiting for a table, I'll try to vacate and suggest we go somewhere else for an after dinner activity (drinks, dessert, conversation).
From the other side of the fence, one policy that annoys me is an overly busy, trendy restaurant that doesn't take reservations. The way I see it, I want to patronize your restaurant and spend money there. But if you don't take reservations, it means I'm simply rolling the dice when I show up. There's nothing more aggravating to me than being hungry and standing for an hour waiting for a table to become available. In those situations, I'm pretty much guaranteed to be in a bad mood before I even look at the menu.
I've always liked the European approach to dining: if you make a reservation and show up, the expectation is that the table is yours for the evening. The food generally costs a little more, but it makes for a much more relaxing night out.
One novel approach I recently ran across is a local restaurant that offers two-seatings a night. Similar to what movie theaters do. You make a reservation for 6:00pm and the table is completely yours until 8:00. Then there is an 8:00-10:00 pm seating. What I like is that it completely sets up expectations for all parties. I really liked it myself.