Barb L.
Master Chef
Maybe Iam just old and stupid- want to half a recipe that calls for 2/3 cups oil ? Is it 1/3 ?? Help !
Last edited by a moderator:
Barb L. said:Maybe Iam just old and stupid- want to half a recipe that calls for 2/3 cups oil ? Is it 1/3 ?? Help !
expatgirl said:It is so hard to go from US measurements to metric....
expatgirl said:It is so hard to go from US measurements to metric...
I'd be willing to bet that Charlie and expatgirl are in complete agreement but looking from opposite ends of question.CharlieD said:You must be kidding me, right?
Do you mean that you measure 3/4 cup, then weigh it, then put half of it, by weight, back in the original container? I use the 1/2 cup measure, don't fill it quite to the top, and get on with cooking.skilletlicker said:That electronic scale is very helpful when halving fractions such as 3/4's. My measuring cup set didn't come with a 3/8's cup.
I do it all the time and almost always use quick approximations like the above. Even baking recipes don't have to be followed that precisely.skilletlicker said:If you cook for one or two as I most often do, scaling back recipes is a pretty common task.
No sir, I meant that metric measurements are much more accurately scaled as CharlieD stated and that an electronic scale can be helpful device in the process, as suggested by expatgirl, and there are very well documented conversions for various flours, etc.Veloce said:Do you mean that you measure 3/4 cup, then weigh it, then put half of it, by weight, back in the original container? I use the 1/2 cup measure, don't fill it quite to the top, and get on with cooking.
Many bakers agree that weight is a better measurement than volume. It is also quicker in my opinion. That doesn't mean that the approximations won't work, but it clearly is not the only way and certainly is not the most precise.Veloce regarding scaling back recipes said:I do it all the time and almost always use quick approximations like the above. Even baking recipes don't have to be followed that precisely.
Veloce said:... As for the 7/64 vs. 3/32 issue, the lowest common denominator is 64, isn't it? And 7/64 is clearly bigger than 6/64, isn't it?