|
|
#1 | |
|
Assistant Cook
|
Cooking on High?
I've used a slow cooker for more than 30 years, but I don't recall ever using the "high" setting. Always figured that meat would be more tender and juicy if cooked on low. Can anyone who slow cooks on high comment on the quality of the result?
TIA Pete K. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Certified Master Chef
|
I generally don't have the time for low, 10-12 hours, we eat dinner about 5, I'd be chopping veggies at 4am.
I have no complaints, but I suppose I can't say a lot, not having used low very often.
__________________
Not that there's anything wrong with that..... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Certified Master Chef
|
I've always use the high setting, meat was always tender.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Certified Master Chef
Site Moderator
|
I rarely use HIGH. When I do, it's because I'm short of time and need to make up the cooking time a bit.
__________________
"As a girl I had zero interest in the stove." - Julia Child This is real inspiration. Look what Julia became! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
DC ADMINISTRATOR
Site Administrator
|
I only use high for certain recipes. Soups can be done on high and so can things that have ground meat. If it is a whole piece of meat then I always cook on low.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Certified Executive Chef
|
My slow cooker's setting go from 1-5. If the roast is started by 11 AM and I want to eat sometime between 6-8, 3 works well. If I want to eat in four hours, then I will turn it up a number or two. I never really noticed a difference, but then I never checked things out with a thermometer either. I just figured slow cookers have a lot of leeway.
You've got me curious the other way.... what would setting it at its lowest setting result in?
__________________
Cow tipping: Redneck meat tenderizer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Assistant Cook
|
I have two slow cookers. Both have essentially two settings: low and high. One is at least 20 years old. Its low setting will bring water to about 190*. The newer one brings water to about 211* (and so its actual temperature probably is higher).
Pete K. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Certified Master Chef
Site Administrator
|
I have very rarely cooked on my low setting. When I put a hunk of meat in I like it to be VERY tender to the pulling stage. Even at high you have to remember you are cooking "slow". I like a good 10 - 12 hours for a roast on high.
__________________
kitchenelf Administrator "Count yourself...you ain't so many" - quote from Buck's Daddy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Senior Cook
|
When I'm starting out with FROZEN chicken I will use HIGH for the first hour or so to bring the temperature up and then turn it to LOW for the rest of the day.
Some recipes add things at the last stages and a shift to HIGH so these items are properly heated/cooked before serving. HIGH is also used to shorten the total cook time for many items to 3-4 hours. On LOW it is generally 6-8, though some dense meats go longer to really become tender.
__________________
Support bacteria. It's the only culture some people have. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Senior Cook
|
I think it depends on the crockpot. I had a crockpot that I always cooked everything on high just to get it hot enough. Since then I have another and I always use low because high will cook it too fast and too hot.
when I first read the post I thought "Cooking on High"...isn't that something only a catholic would do? (having been brought up catholic myself) ![]() ![]() ~Blissful
__________________
![]() DC is a nice place to raise recipes and inspiration. Will I survive this years canning season? |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|