"Discover Cooking, Discuss Life."

Go Back   Discuss Cooking - Cooking Forums > General Cooking Information > General Cooking > Food Shows, News and Media
Click Here to Login
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 08-12-2009, 04:51 AM   #41
Head Chef
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,325
Quote:
Originally Posted by babetoo View Post
use ingredients that are available to most people. price is a factor. i would like to see a show about cooking for one or two. we are not all large families.
Yeah that, and ingredients that have other uses, more common ingredients please. Also, I like recipes that use less ingredients, more is not always better!!!
PattY1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2009, 05:00 AM   #42
Head Chef
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,325
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChefJune View Post
I hear you! and thousands of folks have told them that, and more. However they're not interested. Their "Market Research" tells them that the viewers they want to reach want to see marathons of "Unwrapped" and "Diners, Driveins and whatever." They lost me years ago.

Unwrapped

I like Diner, Drive-ins and Dives. I have a dream of becoming wealthy and traveling to the places on that show!!
PattY1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2009, 07:13 AM   #43
Master Chef
 
CharlieD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: USA,Minnesota
Posts: 9,551
I couldn't stand it anymore and cansel FN. For the money it cost me to get it I'd rather go buy recipe books. I do not want Etertainment, I want pure coking with step by step hows and the recipes. That is what i would tell them, if they cared to listen. I doubt they do.
__________________
You are what you eat.
CharlieD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2009, 07:25 AM   #44
Senior Cook
 
Arky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 299
I like Alton Brown and "Good Eats." For me, that is the best show they have. Tyler Florence and "Tyler's Ultimate" takes second place. I have learned more from these two shows than all of the others combined.
__________________
Never trust a skinny chef!
Arky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2009, 08:45 AM   #45
Senior Cook
 
TheMetalChef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 252
Quote:
Originally Posted by brauvi123 View Post
and don't get me going about the way he mames the English language
I <3 Irony....

psst! brauvi! the word is maim...
__________________
We've moved the show to DailyMotion.com!

(Youtube didn't like us publishing full feature length shows....)
TheMetalChef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2009, 09:44 AM   #46
Senior Cook
 
Arky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 299
After reading all of these responses, the vast majority of them would have us go back 20 years or more in values and recipes of Cooking shows. That's understandable. Many people don't like change (I resist it as well), but then there is reality, and the reality is:

1.) Many of the recipes from those eras have been tremendously improved since then. And, most were basically meat and potato dishes because that is what America was eating at that time. Oh, of course fish and seafood were included, but nothing like they are today. Forget Charizo, curry, cilantro, balsamic vinegar, Calamata olives, smoked paprika or any other exotic ingredient that we often take for granted today. They didn't exist on the culinary scene of yesteryear!

2.) The production values, or should I say the LACK of good production values really dates many of the older shows, and is often quite distracting.

3.) Some of the earliest shows depended upon their chef personalities. Julia Child, Jacque Pepin had a cult-like following, and there was craziness and occasional yelling from chefs such as Graham Kerr and Martin Yan - just as there is today.

I like many, or even most of the old shows, and I would watch some of their reruns just for nostalgia, but by no stretch of the imagination are they superior to some of the shows available today. And regardless of our feelings, one way or the other, the fact is that entertainment sells! If you want just the facts and only the facts, I'm sure the Food Network, who is in business to make money, would say, "Get a cookbook."
__________________
Never trust a skinny chef!
Arky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2009, 10:11 AM   #47
Chief Eating Officer
 
GB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: USA,Massachusetts
Posts: 25,509
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arky View Post

1.) Many of the recipes from those eras have been tremendously improved since then. And, most were basically meat and potato dishes because that is what America was eating at that time. Oh, of course fish and seafood were included, but nothing like they are today. Forget Charizo, curry, cilantro, balsamic vinegar, Calamata olives, smoked paprika or any other exotic ingredient that we often take for granted today. They didn't exist on the culinary scene of yesteryear!
Just because we want the style of show we had in the past does not mean the ingredients have to stay in the past. The style can remain the same with current ingredients.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arky View Post
2.) The production values, or should I say the LACK of good production values really dates many of the older shows, and is often quite distracting.
I find the older styles much less distracting than the current styles. For me, when it comes to cooking shows (note I said cooking, not food travel or food contests or any other number of shows that are about food, but not cooking) less is more for me. Like I mentioned about the Great Chefs show that I loved, one of the reasons I loved it was for its simplicity. There were no "personalities", no special effects or sets, no special anything. It was a restaurant chef in his restaurant kitchen cooking the same way he does every day. The show could have taped without the chef ever knowing anyone was taping him/her because they did not do anything different for the camera. That was the most refreshing and educational cooking show I have seen in a long time.
__________________
You know you can't resist clicking
this link. Your eyes will thank you. VISUAL BLISS
GB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2009, 10:19 AM   #48
Senior Cook
 
Arky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 299
I agree when it comes to "Great Chefs!" Probably, like you, I think that was one of the best food shows that has ever been aired!! And the minimum of narration was wonderful!

But then again, I'm a proponent of sports TV WITHOUT announcers, color commentators, or any other knuckleheads voicing obnoxious opinions.
__________________
Never trust a skinny chef!
Arky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2009, 10:41 AM   #49
Sous Chef
 
Chile Chef's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Winter Park Fl, Or Bust!
Posts: 853
Oh I would tell Bob to cut back on Bobby flays shows a bit.

I would also tell them to air more "Ask Aida" and Alton Brown shows more, And bring back the original Iron Chef!
__________________
Chile Chef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2009, 10:45 AM   #50
Senior Cook
 
Arky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 299
Many of the food shows, including the original "Iron Chef" and Malto Mario have migrated to the Fine Living Network (another of the many Food Network Owned channels.)
__________________
Never trust a skinny chef!
Arky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2009, 11:14 AM   #51
Certified Cake Maniac
 
LPBeier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: The Great "Wet" North
Posts: 20,311
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alix View Post
More Mario Batali please.
I totally second this one.
__________________
Living gluten/dairy/sugar/fat/caffeine-free and loving it!
LPBeier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2009, 11:21 AM   #52
Sous Chef
 
Chile Chef's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Winter Park Fl, Or Bust!
Posts: 853
Quote:
Originally Posted by LPBeier View Post
I totally second this one.
I third that motion!
__________________
Chile Chef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2009, 11:47 AM   #53
Master Chef
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Culpeper, VA
Posts: 5,803
Quote:
Originally Posted by GB View Post
I find the older styles much less distracting than the current styles. For me, when it comes to cooking shows (note I said cooking, not food travel or food contests or any other number of shows that are about food, but not cooking) less is more for me. Like I mentioned about the Great Chefs show that I loved, one of the reasons I loved it was for its simplicity. There were no "personalities", no special effects or sets, no special anything. It was a restaurant chef in his restaurant kitchen cooking the same way he does every day. The show could have taped without the chef ever knowing anyone was taping him/her because they did not do anything different for the camera. That was the most refreshing and educational cooking show I have seen in a long time.
EXACTLY! EXACTLY!! EXACTLY!!! Gee, can you tell I agree?

Back in Food Network's infancy, the older shows notwithstanding, even the the new talent had decent forums. Emeril, Mario Batali, etc., were ALONE in the kitchen, cooking for & speaking to the television audience one-on-one. Now it's either an auditorium audience (a la infomercial - lol), or even MORE annoying, a group of "special friends" (what a friggin joke that is), or some "family/friends" party, yadayadayada. Who the heck believes this stuff or even cares about it? We're not tuning in to see Ina Gartin host a "surprise party" (yeah right) in her Hampton's compound - we just want to see the woman cook (assuming we do want to see her cook - lol).

The minute Food Network started these shenanigans, I started tuning out all the shows one by one.
BreezyCooking is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2009, 11:57 AM   #54
Senior Cook
 
ErikC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 283
I would say "enough of the contests". I love Iron Chef and the head-to-head combat between high-level professionals. But the whole "Hell's Kitchen", "Top Chef" and "Food Network Challenge" is getting pretty old to me. It's just more "Survivor", only in a kitchen.
__________________
Erik

https://www.homemade-soup-recipes.com/
ErikC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2009, 12:01 PM   #55
Senior Cook
 
Arky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 299
Quote:
Originally Posted by ErikC View Post
I would say "enough of the contests". I love Iron Chef and the head-to-head combat between high-level professionals. But the whole "Hell's Kitchen", "Top Chef" and "Food Network Challenge" is getting pretty old to me. It's just more "Survivor", only in a kitchen.
Actually, Iron Chef is Fine Living Network, Iron Chef America is Food TV Network, Hell's Kitchen is Fox Network, and Top Chef is Bravo Network.
__________________
Never trust a skinny chef!
Arky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2009, 12:15 PM   #56
Senior Cook
 
ErikC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 283
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arky View Post
Actually, Iron Chef is Fine Living Network, Iron Chef America is Food TV Network, Hell's Kitchen is Fox Network, and Top Chef is Bravo Network.
Ah...all those shows are on Food TV here in Canada, perhaps as reruns.
__________________
Erik

https://www.homemade-soup-recipes.com/
ErikC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2009, 05:19 PM   #57
Sous Chef
 
ella/TO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 797
Oh Eric, I was just going to say something along those lines. We here at Food TV, Canada keep getting the same old reruns.....to the point of being sickening!!!!!....look at some of the dates....they go back 3, 4 years....not that it matters about dates, but it's the same old, same old....oh dear.....
ella/TO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2009, 05:27 PM   #58
Senior Cook
 
TheMetalChef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 252
Quote:
Originally Posted by BreezyCooking View Post
EXACTLY! EXACTLY!! EXACTLY!!! Gee, can you tell I agree?

Back in Food Network's infancy, the older shows notwithstanding, even the the new talent had decent forums. Emeril, Mario Batali, etc., were ALONE in the kitchen, cooking for & speaking to the television audience one-on-one. Now it's either an auditorium audience (a la infomercial - lol), or even MORE annoying, a group of "special friends" (what a friggin joke that is), or some "family/friends" party, yadayadayada. Who the heck believes this stuff or even cares about it? We're not tuning in to see Ina Gartin host a "surprise party" (yeah right) in her Hampton's compound - we just want to see the woman cook (assuming we do want to see her cook - lol).

The minute Food Network started these shenanigans, I started tuning out all the shows one by one.
Funny you mention this.

A chief complaint I get from fans of my show (not that there are a ton of them out there, but still...) is that there's not enough footage of people eating and enjoying my food.

I wonder if just plating it isn't enough for the majority of the modern foodie audience? They like to see people having a good time eating the food the chef just walked you through preparing...

That said, Emeril's wannabe David Letterman act got old fast, and Paula Deen's wannabe act of Emeril's wannabe act went straight to 8-track after the first episode...
__________________
We've moved the show to DailyMotion.com!

(Youtube didn't like us publishing full feature length shows....)
TheMetalChef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2009, 05:35 PM   #59
Certified Cake Maniac
 
LPBeier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: The Great "Wet" North
Posts: 20,311
Quote:
Originally Posted by ella/TO View Post
Oh Eric, I was just going to say something along those lines. We here at Food TV, Canada keep getting the same old reruns.....to the point of being sickening!!!!!....look at some of the dates....they go back 3, 4 years....not that it matters about dates, but it's the same old, same old....oh dear.....
Yes, Ella and Eric, I am totally with you there. I am really tired of hearing that so and so won Top Chef or Food Network Challenge or what have you and I don't see it for one or two years later. (I am not meaning people spill the beans, but it is on the net, in the media, etc.)

I remember one case with the Next Food Network Star where they were advertising the current American season of it on FN Canada and when I tuned in, it was the same one as we had just seen.

I do like some of the Canadian shows we have, but they do repeat things a little too much.

If I could tell Food Network Canada one thing it would be PLEASE stop showing 3 repeats a day of License to Grill with Rob Rainford....let that one die!
__________________
Living gluten/dairy/sugar/fat/caffeine-free and loving it!
LPBeier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2009, 06:12 PM   #60
Assistant Cook
 
yogiwan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Reno Nevada
Posts: 47
Diners, Drive-ins and Dives seems to be more about the host and what he enjoys as it is about the food or its preparation (frequently missing). I like the idea of the chef or chef owner presenting from their perspective. And it does not always have to be from the leading edge perspectives such as French Laundry (once a year experience if I'm lucky) but could be from the perspective of a successful restaurant that produces good to great food every day for a wide range of customers.

I love going to a place in San Jose (Hawg's Seafood Diner) as the food is always good, they add innovative dishes to their regular fare and it is a joy to watch the kitchen staff do their thing. No "master chef" but a couple of guys who really know what they are doing directed by in involved owner and supported by skilled cooks.

Getting this approach to be understandable to the 'chef wannabee' at home would make meals better, less effort and more enjoyable for all.
__________________
yogiwan
yogiwan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.