CharlieD said:
Hey, Dog if something like this were to happen, I will distinctly (sp?) remeber that we spend the whole day and evening cooking together some elaborate meal in my kitchen!
You know, I seem to remember this too, CD! Hee hee hee . . . . . .
CharlieD said:
Sick bustards desrve to die just on suspicion that they were doing something like that. let their lawyer proove them not guilty afterwards. i'm sure there will be some scum from ACLU defending their rights, grrrrr
This taps a part of law enforcement that I struggle with. In my Constitutional Law class, we had a guest speaker come in that had appealed a case all the way to the Supreme Court, and wound up winning at the SC level. He knew his client was guilty as sin, but rights were allegedly (and actually in the High Court's eye) violated, and the guy walked. I don't recall the actual crime, but it was a crime against a person.
Cops have it tough going after sick $#%^*@ like child molesters. They want to get these poor excuses for humans off the street just as much as anyone else, and truthfully sometimes rules, regulations, and laws get bent a bit. Sometime that's the only way to actually get the incriminating evidence. But technically, you violated someone's rights, and if they get an attorney with an agenda, they get off committing a felony because a right was violated. Yet ironically, once convicted, they no longer have a multitude of rights. I'm a proponent for the protection of rights, and the concept of innocent until proven guilty, but the police have developed a keen sense over time as to determining the validity of one's statement regarding a crime. It's a very tough line to walk, because I'm sure we all want our rights protected, but wouldn't be offended if the rights of a molester were violated in order to arrest the molester. The Constitution doesn't differentiate (sp?) between innocents like you and I, and the guilty molesters and other criminals.
By no means am I supporting abuse of power by law enforcement. Tune ups, a la NYPD Blue style, should not be tolerated. Coersion, what is it's actual definition? What I think coersion is may be different than you. Give a defense attorney the opportunity of possible coersion, and watch the DA drop your case like a hot potato! Yet statement coaching and other types of coersion are permitted.
I should get off my soap box. Sorry.