"Discover Cooking, Discuss Life."

Go Back   Discuss Cooking - Cooking Forums > General Cooking Information > Cookware and Accessories
Click Here to Login
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-25-2014, 07:43 AM   #1
Master Chef
Mad Cook's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: North West England
Posts: 5,134
Crock-pot Sauté?


A friend has asked my advice about this Crockpot but I haven't used it, neither do I know anyone who has one.

Do any DC-ers have any comments? Pros and/or cons?

Does it actually slow cook? The ones I have, including an ordinary Crockpot tend to boil rather furiously even on the lower setting.

The blurb suggests 4-5 servings. If you have one would you say that's an accurate estimate?
Don’t look for the light at the end of the tunnel. Stomp along and switch the bl**dy thing on yourself.
Mad Cook is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2014, 12:17 PM   #2
Wine Guy
Steve Kroll's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
Posts: 6,345
I haven't tried it, but I think it's a great idea to have a crock pot that you can also sauté in.

Other than reheating food for potluck dinners, I don't use a crock pot for actual cooking, simply for the reason that you can't use it for browning. A feature like this might sway my opinion of these cookers.
Steve Kroll is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2014, 08:02 PM   #3
Executive Chef
bakechef's Avatar
Site Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 4,127
I have the Ninja 3-in-1 cooking system. It has a metal nonstick liner and the ability to brown the meat before slow cooking. It promotes "searing" but it doesn't get that hot. If you put the meat in the bottom and leave it there, it'll brown nicely, turn it over and repeat. I like it a lot. It also has a timer.
I'm Bloggin'

bakechef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2014, 08:32 PM   #4
Chef Extraordinaire
Addie's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: East Boston, MA
Posts: 22,365
Thumbs up Crock Pot

This is made by Rival Crock Pot. And that name is well respected in this country. It was the originator of the slow cooker. I have found them to be very reliable. The fact that you can brown meat in it is definitely a big plus.

I say I give this a thumbs up!
Illegitimi non carborundum!
I don't want my last words to be, "I wish I had spent more time doing housework"
Addie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2014, 10:00 AM   #5
Head Chef
GLC's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Near Austin, Texas
Posts: 1,216
I don't use my slow cooker much anymore, but I think a lot of people who do use one are looking for convenience and a minimum of messing with and attending. And even though that's not often an issue with me, I still appreciate being able to brown over high heat in my Dutch oven and move it to the oven to cook. And that's the selling point here, with the pot being designed to stand high burner heat and then move to the cooker. It's not really "one-pot" cooking if you have to brown in a separate pan first. So this is genuinely one pot.

As to "slow cooking," it is my opinion that any slow cooker must have at least one cooking setting somewhat below 212F (100C). Typical slow cookers do not have thermostats. They are designed aimed at the heating element staying at a preset temperature for each setting. They don't pile on extra heat to get started, which is why a cold start calls for pre-heated liquid. Over time, the temperature in the pot will equalize to the element temperature.

But I do find that most will boil on the high position, and I would prefer some things not to boil for esthetic reasons. So, what you want to know is if the Low setting is around 175F (79C) or a little less, which will cook in reasonable time without boiling. I mean, if I want to boil, I don't need a slow cooker, because any pot will limit out at the boiling point, even on a high burner. You will see that slow cooker makers never associate particular temperatures with settings. They're not intended to hold precise temperatures.

Now, there's slow cooking and SLOW cooking. A slow cooker is not for sous vide. It hasn't the range nor precision. It's for cooking slowly with little risk of overcooking, and it's pretty strictly for braise type operations where well done is the expected outcome. Remember the difference. Doneness means temperature, and slow cookers are always above the well done range. Tenderness means time, and it's what slow cookers do well.

As to servings, it says 4.7L. Figure probably 4L practically, so eight servings, if everyone gets about two cups. Sounds reasonable for hearty meals.
"Kitchen duty is awarded only to those of manifest excellence..." - The Master, Dogen
GLC is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:36 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.