tenspeed
Executive Chef
I'm considering replacing my 25 plus year old Weber gas grill. It's still functional, but it's the old design where the burners run side to side instead of front to back, making it a little more difficult to vary the temperature of the grill. It's a little smaller than the new 3 burner models (new ones are 3 inches wider and 2 inches deeper), and sometimes it's a bit too small when I want to grill meat and veggies. I'm looking for opinions on:
Number of burners. It's usually just the two of us, so three burners would almost always be adequate. However, I'm wondering if a four burner model would be more versatile in allowing greater variation in temperature across the grill (not to mention additional capacity when we entertain). With the three burner model it looks like it would still be hot with one burner shut down, but I'm wondering how it works in actual use. Any drawbacks to a four burner model? When I grill a spatchcocked chicken I do it over charcoal, as the flareups are a problem on my smaller gas grill. My thinking is that the four burner might make it easier to keep the chicken away from the flame.
Grate material. Weber offers a choice of stainless or porcelain coated cast iron. I've never used SS grates, and wonder how they compare. Also, Weber offers a three burner model with larger diameter SS rods, and I wonder if they offer any advantage.
Side burner. I've never felt the need for one, but wonder if it is one of those things that you find useful once you have them. It looks like you can't fit a larger pot or a wok on it. I have a propane burner, which I drag out when I want to use a large pot outside (like cooking mussels). It's difficult to maintain a low temperature on the big burner, though.
Sear station. We don't have steak very often, and generally don't cook larger pieces of meat. Is this a useful feature?
Between the durability of a Weber and my age, this will probably be the last grill I buy, and I want to get it right. Any comments would be appreciated.
Number of burners. It's usually just the two of us, so three burners would almost always be adequate. However, I'm wondering if a four burner model would be more versatile in allowing greater variation in temperature across the grill (not to mention additional capacity when we entertain). With the three burner model it looks like it would still be hot with one burner shut down, but I'm wondering how it works in actual use. Any drawbacks to a four burner model? When I grill a spatchcocked chicken I do it over charcoal, as the flareups are a problem on my smaller gas grill. My thinking is that the four burner might make it easier to keep the chicken away from the flame.
Grate material. Weber offers a choice of stainless or porcelain coated cast iron. I've never used SS grates, and wonder how they compare. Also, Weber offers a three burner model with larger diameter SS rods, and I wonder if they offer any advantage.
Side burner. I've never felt the need for one, but wonder if it is one of those things that you find useful once you have them. It looks like you can't fit a larger pot or a wok on it. I have a propane burner, which I drag out when I want to use a large pot outside (like cooking mussels). It's difficult to maintain a low temperature on the big burner, though.
Sear station. We don't have steak very often, and generally don't cook larger pieces of meat. Is this a useful feature?
Between the durability of a Weber and my age, this will probably be the last grill I buy, and I want to get it right. Any comments would be appreciated.