OREO Post Malone Swirled Salted Caramel and Shortbread Flavor Creme Review...

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that enjoys cooking.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.

kleenex

Master Chef
Joined
Nov 8, 2004
Messages
5,497
OREO-Post-Malone-Oreo-Cookies-LIMITED-EDITION-2025_bc9ab254-a993-4f82-a10b-aa760d3514ba.6f69ab034999f3a6fc86082f3676f1f1.jpeg


Back to Wal-mart for this new flavor with a collab from a Music star,

This flavor has a swirled Salted Caramel and Shortbread Flavor Creme. The cookies are one black and one golden one with some special stamps on them.

I liked the creme in this. Did have a salted taste it.

A medium sized thumbs up from me on this item.
 
In this particular case the apostrophe signifies that something belongs to someone or thing (a noun). eg. the dog's bone.
The only other use of an apostrophe are of letters having been left out of a word (contractions). Actually it is rather easy to tell the difference, when an apostrophe has letters (other than an s) after it, for example n't as can't= can not or don't= do not.
As previously posted on several occasions a snicketypoosna is a creature that has no legs, has scales and is a far distant and vastly vilified relative to my family. So vilified 'the family' do not even condone the use of the common and rather base human term.
Nor will you find it in a human dictionary or Wikipedia.
 
So, did you mean the scales belonging to a snicketypoosna? I notice you didn't use the possessive form of dragon, when you wrote dragon scales.
 
Dragon scales - good. Snicketypoosna's - not good.
Because if you will note it was not necessary with Dragon scales because I used the word scales.
Had I said Snicketypoosna scales, you will note that it would not then be really necessary.
I could have said a dragon's scales as I suppose I could have said a snicketypoosna's scales. I used the possessive there as I thought the actual word snicketypoosna was quite long enough for the post to be read quickly and efficiently. That obviously didn't (note use of a contraction here) work here as this dragon's (note use of possessive apostrophe here) post has evolved into several extra posts. Hopefully not boring for others.

Hey @kleenex sorry my post seems to have caused a detraction to your review!
 
It may not have been necessary with dragon scales, but it would have increased the clarity of what you were trying to express. Parallel phrasing kinda thing.
 
Sorry @kleenex , this looks to be never ending.

@taxlady
Well, you seem to have understood that I was not talking about the package when I said:-
The package looks like scales.
When in actual fact the package looks like a box or rectangular paper wrapper for a chocolate bar.
When it is actually the picture on the wrapper that looks like scales. I would find it hard to believe that anyone would think that the actual wrapper is made of scales.
So then I say:-
Dragon scales - good. Snicketypoosna's - not good.

Break apart the two sentences thus:-
1. Dragon scales - good.
2. Snicketypoosna's - not good.

Then to analyze:-
if in sentence 1. we are talking about 'dragon' scales being is good
and then in sentence 2. we are saying something is not good
and seeing as there were only four nouns in the whole post - package, scales, dragon and snicketypoosna I (obviously mistakenly) assumed most people would understand I was also talking about scales in the 2nd sentence.
Only other noun that could be used would have been package which would have meant
dragon scales - good
snicketypoosna package - not good
That does not make sense even to me.
Now I'd like to think that most people would have been able to figure that out and/or give me the benefit of the doubt to have the intelligence to have further explained in the post and not leave it as such a cryptic message.
 
I thought the same thing, that it looked like scales. Reminded me, personally, of snakeskin.

But they're obviously guitar pics? And who the hell is Post Malone? (or Malone Post?)

I'd look it up real quick, but I gotta get out the door for work. That and I'm not sure I really care all that much, just thought I'd ask.

As for the cookies themselves, I'd try them, if they were already purchased by someone else.
 
Back
Top Bottom