pictonguy
Executive Chef
I agree in Principe with you, yeah not good for the underaged, no doubt about it and they need protecting, full stop.I think perhaps you have to see the damage it does first hand.
For example the damage to young girls self esteem, my good friends little girl is now in and out of treatment for anorexia and whilst anorexia has always occurred there’s no debate statistically (no matter what reliable source you use) that eating disorders have doubled in the last 10 years with social media now a common component. Even in it’s mildest form it provides constant ‘thinspiration’ and if they click on that stuff (as curious young minds tend to do) then it can quickly take them down a nasty rabbit hole.
Or a while back my youngest son was bombarded with Andrew Tate bile including direct messaging, it’s designed to directly target boys insecurities.
There’s widespread reporting by teachers of increasing sexist and misogynistic behaviour in school. When you consider the damage to their development and the long term consequences, it is no laughing matter.
Fortunately my son was an older teen (18) when this happened and is not a misogynist or prone to falling for macho tropes but the only way to stop it was to leave facebook and twitter.
So the choice is for many kids stay and have this stuff constantly thrown at you or cut yourself off from your peers, that’s not much of a choice.
The hideous trend of making AI faked images of female classmates faces put on an adult woman’s porno body were all circulated around by social media.
The consequences are devastating to those little girls. Being pointed and sniggered at and knowing everyone is looking at that brings a type of shame that has driven girls as young as 12 years old to change school.
Social media is currently an adult world they’re too young to navigate. Parental controls do not work.
Any good parent protects a child from the uglier side of adult life until they’re old enough to manage, that’s part of what having a childhood is.
Developing healthy frameworks and knowing what they are being told or shown isn’t gospel and not the way things we do things takes time.
Until they’re knowledgeable and experienced enough to be able to withstand the onslaught of explicit images and extreme rhetoric I think they really should be left alone.
My concern is in the big picture where once you build age verification, digital ID checks, platform level enforcement and gov't oversight of who can access what, can easily be repurposed later building an infrastructure where other logical platforms can be then be easily implemented for say older people, people with cognitive decline, people with mental health vulnerabilities or people they feel are at risk in a more general sense which can trigger gov't surveillance laws, emergency powers where peoples bank accounts can and have been frozen and once that machinery exists, future governments can use it to their discretion.