RPCookin
Executive Chef
Not much to say... moonrise and renewable energy... Just liked the composition.
Hey RP, can I make a suggestion as a professional photographer? Don't distract attention from a nice image with huge copyright text. Your photos are protected by copyright laws, whether or not you announce it on the photo. All you are doing is messing up a really nice photograph.
Just my 2-cents.
CD
I don't really expect to take anyone to court, with or without the copyright. I use it mostly when I post to any of the several discussion forums that I visit, and I don't post anything larger than 1024 px on the long side. Just makes it harder for anyone to alter and use it. I realize that it's easy to cut it out, but copying a smallish jpeg and then messing around with it just degrades the file that much more, making it less attractive for anyone to "borrow". When using them for anything else, I export from Lightroom without the copyright.
I may take your advice and try it without on some photos. Thank's for the suggestion, Casey.
If I may ask, how long have you been shooting professionally? I've been on and off doing amateur stuff since the mid 70's (Minolta 102 35mm), but took a long break from putting any real effort into it for 20 years. Started getting back into it in 2010 when I bought my first DSLR (Canon T3i). Now I shoot with a 60D.
I really do like your images. But, that copyright text is like a giant zit on a person's nose -- you can't help but look at it, and not see the person's face for what it is. If you feel that you have to do it, make it a lot smaller, so it isn't the first thing your eye wants to go to.
CD
This is gorgeous.It's kind of ironic that I'll take the time to remove or minimize an unwanted object in an otherwise decent image, then put that watermark in the corner. You are probably right that I'm just giving myself a false sense of security. Is this better?
It's kind of ironic that I'll take the time to remove or minimize an unwanted object in an otherwise decent image, then put that watermark in the corner. You are probably right that I'm just giving myself a false sense of security. Is this better?
It's kind of ironic that I'll take the time to remove or minimize an unwanted object in an otherwise decent image, then put that watermark in the corner. You are probably right that I'm just giving myself a false sense of security. Is this better?
Today was a very unusual day, I shot about 5-million dollars worth of cars -- with just these three cars. A Porsche Carrera GT, a Porsche 918 Spyder, and a Ferrari Enzo. Somedays, it is good to be me. Others, not so much.
CD
.
I saw this really cool mailbox yesterday:
Update: I got the front cover with my Porsche 918 photo! It's been at least a year since I got a cover of an auction catalog. I'm out of my slump.
Oh, I got the back cover, too, with the Saleen S7. Woohoo!
CD
.