HAH! So they slapped a new title on an everyday thing so they could add a couple of bucks to the price!Bone broth=Stock.
HAH! So they slapped a new title on an everyday thing so they could add a couple of bucks to the price!Bone broth=Stock.
HAH! So they slapped a new title on an everyday thing so they could add a couple of bucks to the price!
While it's not bad for you, it doesn't do much good, either. Iceberg lettuce has very little nutritional value.I want ICEBERG LETTUCE, thankyouverymuch.
A restaurant in New York City was selling it for $12 a cup a few years ago.HAH! So they slapped a new title on an everyday thing so they could add a couple of bucks to the price!
Field greens have been around for decades..they used to call it Mesclun and has been renamed for marketing purposes, I suppose..
At least we don't have to deal with "Super Foods" much anymore..
There was a study done on quinoa and chia seeds a while back and it was discovered that they were no more healthier for you than potatoes..
The only reference on calcium in bone broth that I've been able to find comes to the opposite conclusion; it looks like the calcium in vegetables is more soluble than that in bones. If you know of evidence that bone broth has more calcium than milk, I'd like to see it.Bone broth also releases, into solution, dietary calcium and phosphate that is easily digestible. Thus, reducing the need for supplementation with OTC minerals. Better than milk for building strong bones.
The inescapable conclusion is not much calcium ends up in the broth, even when the bones are cooked long enough to have softened and begun to dissolve. As the King’s College research team found back in 1934 and we confirmed as part of the analysis for the book Nourishing Broth, the best way to increase the calcium content of bone broth is to include calcium-rich vegetables while making the broth.Adding milk or cream to the broth to make cream soups or chowders would most appreciably increase the calcium content.
Why does it always have to be my favorite salad green? Grrr...Romaine recalls
Every time I hear there’s a romaine recall, I’m forced to picture a thousand people with explosive diarrhea. For that alone—and I know it can get more serious than that—can we stop planting romaine next to creeks next to cow pastures? All of these years of technology and progress and the cow poop is still getting in the water, then to the lettuce, and then to Panera?
While it's not bad for you, it doesn't do much good, either. Iceberg lettuce has very little nutritional value.
Field greens have been around for decades..they used to call it Mesclun and has been renamed for marketing purposes, I suppose..
At least we don't have to deal with "Super Foods" much anymore..
There was a study done on quinoa and chia seeds a while back and it was discovered that they were no more healthier for you than potatoes..
God, I hope you're right! I'm *so sick* of hearing about that.
Bone broth also releases, into solution, dietary calcium and phosphate that is easily digestible. Thus, reducing the need for supplementation with OTC minerals. Better than milk for building strong bones.
Sorry, I misspoke. There's not very much calcium in bone broth to begin with, though. For that reason, I don't think it's accurate to promote it as good for bone health. Even if the calcium from milk is less bio-available, it has so much more that you have to drink a lot less to get the same benefit. The better nutrition advice would be to advocate for eating more vegetables, since the calcium they contain is more soluble.I never said it had more calcium than milk. I said it was easily digestible and has increased bio-availability.
Recent USDA figures for brand-name canned broths sold at supermarkets show calcium at just 14 mg per cup (1.4% of the RDA) for beef and 9 mg (0.9% of the RDA) per cup for chicken. By comparison, USDA reports 291.0 mg of calcium per cup for whole milk.
While it is easy to dismiss these figures as what’s to be expected from the poor quality of broth found in commercial products, low calcium levels were also reported by Saffron Road and Flavor Chef Broths, two excellent brands sold in health food stores. The Nutrition Facts labels reported on their labels are 0 percent and 4 percent of the RDA, respectively, per cup of the RDA for calcium.
Sally Fallon Morell, President of the Weston A. Price Foundation and I found this so unbelievable that we decided more testing was warranted before completing Nourishing Broth: An Old-Fashioned Remedy for the Modern World (Grand Central Life & Style, September 2014).
The reports that came in from Covance Laboratories in Madison, Wisconsin, were much the same. Broth prepared by Kim Schuette of Biodynamic Wellness of Solana Beach, California, showed low levels of calcium at 2.31 mg per cup (from a whole chicken plus two feet but not vegetables), while broth from Lance Roll of Flavor Chef showed 6.14 mg per cup (from broth made with bones and vegetables).
I agree it's a healthful thing to eat. I'm just saying, in the context of this post about trendy foods, its benefits have been greatly exaggerated. It won't cure arthritis or smooth wrinkles and it doesn't acquire more calcium by simmering it for two days rather than a few hours. That's what I was addressing in my initial comment about it.I am not lactose intolerant, but I do not drink milk. I get my calcium from the foods I eat, bone broth is a viable ingredient in recipes. It also has other benefits, like collagen (your body does need the amino acid building blocks in order to build), MSM, Phosphate and other minerals and vitamins that your body needs and uses.
I have not said that bone broth is a miracle food, to each his own. Just making a comment on it's merits.
Don't care
I eat plenty of other healthful foods. But a BLT must have iceberg lettuce.