it doesn’t save waterThanks, jennyema. No, I didn't do any evaluations. I just ignorantly assumed that it would be done in a lot less time. And your point about not opening the pot s well taken, and one that I shouldn't have missed, since the better grades of pasta from Italy taken notably longer to cook than the industrial brands.
I have seen Kenji (the author of that article) do spaghetti that way. He didn't break it in half. He cooked it in a skillet. It was in this video for Garlic Noodles. You can see him putting the spaghetti into a small amount of simmering water at the beginning of the video.This method will save water and energy: "SPOILER ALERT: It turns out that not only do you not need a large volume of water to cook pasta, but in fact, the water does not even have to be boiling."
A New Way to Cook Pasta? | The Food Lab
We do clams that way also.Plus I also do mussels in a large shallow pan rather than a deep pot. Mussels pretty much all open at the same time and much faster. No rubbery mussels caught in the bottom of a deep pan that you are trying to shake!
The article was written several years ago, before he left Serious Eats and started his YouTube channel.I have seen Kenji (the author of that article) do spaghetti that way. He didn't break it in half. He cooked it in a skillet. It was in this video for Garlic Noodles. You can see him putting the spaghetti into a small amount of simmering water at the beginning of the video.
There's less water left, but enough to thin your sauce. I usually use a spider or tongs to move the pasta from its cooking pot to the sauce pot. Some water comes over with it and I can add more if necessary.I like the idea of cooking pasta in a large skillet or shallow pan, but I have one small problem with it. My sauce, if too thick, is thinned with pasta water. Does one drain the pasta water into a bowl?
If I can solve the problem of lack of pasta water, I'm going to give the shallow pan a try. Love the ideas and techniques offered on this site!
There are people who want to use their Instant Pot for everything lol I've seen recipes for cooking the pasta and the sauce together in the pot. I guess it would infuse the sauce flavors into the pasta, but I've never tried it.It only takes 10 to 12 minutes to cook maccheroni, why futz around with a pressure cooker?
I've made a couple of 1 pot pasta recipes on the stove where the pasta cooks in with everything else. They actually worked and came out quite tasty.There are people who want to use their Instant Pot for everything lol I've seen recipes for cooking the pasta and the sauce together in the pot. I guess it would infuse the sauce flavors into the pasta, but I've never tried it.
One of the reasons that Kenji used a skillet for his spaghetti in that video is because with less water, the pasta water will have a higher concentration of starch and works even better for thickening the sauce.I like the idea of cooking pasta in a large skillet or shallow pan, but I have one small problem with it. My sauce, if too thick, is thinned with pasta water. Does one drain the pasta water into a bowl?
If I can solve the problem of lack of pasta water, I'm going to give the shallow pan a try. Love the ideas and techniques offered on this site!